Countries by Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Number of Sources

India, Mexico, New Zealand, and Singapore share the top rank in this metric, each recorded with 9 sources contributing to their political stability and absence of violence/terrorism assessment in 2023. At the other end, American Samoa stands alone at rank 205 with just 1 source. The gap between 9 and 1 reflects how unevenly the underlying governance survey infrastructure covers different countries and territories.

Ranking 2023

Countries by Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Number of Sources
Rank Country Value
1India9
1Mexico9
1New Zealand9
1Singapore9
5Australia8
5Austria8
5Bangladesh8
5Botswana8
5Brazil8
5Bulgaria8
5China8
5Colombia8
5Croatia8
5Estonia8
5France8
5Germany8
5Ghana8
5Greece8
5Hungary8
5Indonesia8
5Jordan8
5Kazakhstan8
5South Korea8
5Malaysia8
5Peru8
5Philippines8
5Portugal8
5Romania8
5Saudi Arabia8
5Slovakia8
5Spain8
5Thailand8
5United Kingdom8
5United States8
5Venezuela8
5Vietnam8
37Angola7
37Argentina7
37Belgium7
37Canada7
37Chile7
37DR Congo7
37Costa Rica7
37Côte d'Ivoire7
37Cyprus7
37Czechia7
37Denmark7
37El Salvador7
37Finland7
37Gambia7
37Hong Kong7
37Ireland7
37Italy7
37Japan7
37Kuwait7
37Kyrgyzstan7
37Latvia7
37Liberia7
37Lithuania7
37Luxembourg7
37Madagascar7
37Mongolia7
37Morocco7
37Mozambique7
37Nepal7
37Netherlands7
37Nigeria7
37Norway7
37Pakistan7
37Paraguay7
37Poland7
37Sierra Leone7
37Slovenia7
37South Africa7
37Sri Lanka7
37Sweden7
37Tanzania7
37Togo7
37Türkiye7
37United Arab Emirates7
81Albania6
81Algeria6
81Bahamas6
81Bahrain6
81Barbados6
81Belarus6
81Bolivia6
81Bosnia and Herzegovina6
81Burkina Faso6
81Cambodia6
81Cameroon6
81Republic of Congo6
81Dominican Republic6
81Ecuador6
81Egypt6
81Ethiopia6
81Gabon6
81Georgia6
81Guatemala6
81Guinea6
81Guyana6
81Haiti6
81Honduras6
81Iceland6
81Iran6
81Iraq6
81Israel6
81Jamaica6
81Kenya6
81Lebanon6
81Malawi6
81Mali6
81Malta6
81Mauritius6
81Moldova6
81Montenegro6
81Myanmar6
81Namibia6
81Nicaragua6
81Niger6
81North Macedonia6
81Panama6
81Papua New Guinea6
81Qatar6
81Russia6
81Rwanda6
81Senegal6
81Serbia6
81Sudan6
81Suriname6
81Switzerland6
81Trinidad and Tobago6
81Tunisia6
81Uganda6
81Ukraine6
81Uruguay6
81Uzbekistan6
81Zambia6
81Zimbabwe6
140Afghanistan5
140Armenia5
140Azerbaijan5
140Belize5
140Benin5
140Brunei5
140Central African Republic5
140Chad5
140Cuba5
140North Korea5
140Kosovo5
140Lesotho5
140Libya5
140Mauritania5
140Oman5
140Puerto Rico5
140Samoa5
140Seychelles5
140Somalia5
140Syria5
140Timor-Leste5
140Vanuatu5
140Palestine5
140Yemen5
164Antigua and Barbuda4
164Bhutan4
164Burundi4
164Cabo Verde4
164Djibouti4
164Dominica4
164Equatorial Guinea4
164Eritrea4
164Eswatini4
164Fiji4
164Grenada4
164Guinea-Bissau4
164Kiribati4
164Laos4
164Liechtenstein4
164Maldives4
164Sao Tome and Principe4
164Solomon Islands4
164Saint Kitts and Nevis4
164Saint Lucia4
164Saint Vincent and the Grenadines4
164Tajikistan4
164Tonga4
164Turkmenistan4
164Tuvalu4
189Andorra3
189Aruba3
189Cayman Islands3
189Comoros3
189Marshall Islands3
189Micronesia3
189Monaco3
189Nauru3
189Palau3
189San Marino3
189South Sudan3
200Bermuda2
200Greenland2
200Guam2
200Macao2
200U.S. Virgin Islands2
205American Samoa1

Analysis

This metric counts the number of data sources used to construct each country's Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism score under the Worldwide Governance Indicators. The unit is an absolute value representing source count, and higher values indicate more sources contributing to the estimate. According to the source note, the Worldwide Governance Indicators are a research dataset summarizing the views on the quality of governance provided by a large number of enterprise, citizen and expert survey respondents in industrial and developing countries. Governance consists of the traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised. This includes the process by which governments are selected, mo[nitored and replaced]. The 2023 dataset covers 205 countries, meeting the 80-country coverage threshold. All 205 datapoints come from official sources, and 100 percent of countries have data from the last seven years. No extreme outliers were detected at the three-standard-deviation threshold, and average year-over-year change was 4.7 percent, well below the 50 percent volatility threshold.

The four top-ranked countries, India (rank 1, value 9), Mexico (rank 1, value 9), New Zealand (rank 1, value 9), and Singapore (rank 1, value 9), each draw on the maximum recorded number of sources in this dataset. A large cluster of 32 countries follows at rank 5 with 8 sources, including Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, China, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia. These are predominantly large economies or globally prominent states for which major survey programs and expert assessments routinely collect governance data. A second large cluster of 44 countries sits at rank 37 with 7 sources, including Canada, Japan, Sweden, Nigeria, South Africa, and Turkey, reflecting continued broad but slightly less comprehensive coverage.

The middle of the ranking, ranks 81 through 139, comprises 59 countries with 6 sources each, spanning a wide range of governance contexts: Switzerland and Iceland sit alongside Iraq, Haiti, Sudan, and Myanmar at the same source count of 6. Countries ranked 140 through 163 record 5 sources, including Afghanistan, Somalia, Syria, Libya, and Yemen alongside smaller or less-surveyed states such as Brunei and Samoa. The bottom tiers show smaller and more isolated territories: ranks 189 through 199 record 3 sources and include Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, South Sudan, and several Pacific island states. Ranks 200 through 204 record 2 sources and include Bermuda, Greenland, Guam, Macao SAR China, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. American Samoa stands alone at rank 205 with 1 source.

A key limitation of this metric is that it measures data availability rather than governance outcomes. A country with 9 sources is not necessarily more stable or less violent than one with 3; it simply has more survey and expert inputs feeding into its score. Territories and smaller jurisdictions are structurally disadvantaged because fewer global survey instruments reach them. Source counts are also not directly comparable across years without examining which specific sources were added or removed. The metric does not capture the quality, recency, or representativeness of individual sources, only their count. Rankings tied at the same value, such as the 32-country cluster at rank 5 or the 59-country cluster at rank 81, cannot be differentiated using this indicator alone.

Methodology

Metric: Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Number of Sources. Indicator code: PV.NO.SRC. Data source: World Bank World Development Indicators, drawing on the Worldwide Governance Indicators research dataset. Definition per source note: the Worldwide Governance Indicators are a research dataset summarizing the views on the quality of governance provided by a large number of enterprise, citizen and expert survey respondents in industrial and developing countries. Governance consists of the traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised. This includes the process by which governments are selected, mo[nitored and replaced]. Unit: absolute value (count of sources). Higher values are better. Data year: 2023. Country coverage: 205 countries, exceeding the 80-country threshold. Recency: 100 percent of countries have data from the last seven years. Data quality: 100 percent of datapoints are classified as official. Outliers: zero extreme outliers detected at the three-standard-deviation threshold. Volatility: average year-over-year change of 4.7 percent, below the 50 percent threshold. Value range: 1 to 9, a spread of 800 percent. Microstates under one million population: 0 of 205.

Sources