Countries by Government Effectiveness: Percentile Rank

Singapore ranks 1st with a perfect percentile score of 100% on the World Bank's Government Effectiveness indicator, while South Sudan sits last at 0% — a complete span of the ranking. The 205-country dataset shows a wide and continuous distribution, with no clustering at the extremes suggesting the gap reflects deep structural variation in governance capacity across countries.

Ranking 2023

Values shown in %.

Countries by Government Effectiveness: Percentile Rank
Rank Country %
1Singapore100.00
2Switzerland99.53
3Monaco99.06
4Denmark98.58
5Luxembourg98.11
6Norway97.64
7Finland97.17
8Japan96.70
9Liechtenstein96.23
10Netherlands95.75
11United Arab Emirates95.28
12Sweden94.81
13Ireland94.34
14Australia93.87
15Iceland93.40
16Hong Kong92.92
17New Zealand92.45
18Canada91.98
19Andorra91.04
20South Korea90.57
21Brunei90.09
22Austria89.62
23Estonia88.68
24Cayman Islands88.21
25United States87.74
26Bermuda87.26
26San Marino87.26
28Qatar85.85
29Germany85.38
30United Kingdom84.43
31Israel83.49
32France83.02
33Czechia82.55
34Macao82.08
35Lithuania81.60
36Slovenia81.13
37Belgium80.66
38Portugal80.19
39Malaysia79.72
40Uruguay79.25
41Saudi Arabia78.77
42Aruba78.30
43Georgia77.83
44Greenland77.36
45Spain76.89
46Cyprus76.42
47Chile75.94
48Croatia75.47
49Mauritius75.00
50Bahrain74.53
51Latvia74.06
52China73.58
53American Samoa73.11
53Guam73.11
53U.S. Virgin Islands73.11
56Seychelles70.75
57Italy70.28
58Indonesia69.81
59Bhutan69.34
60Samoa68.87
61Fiji68.40
62India67.92
63Palau67.45
64Botswana66.98
65Poland66.51
66Jamaica66.04
67Malta65.57
68Rwanda65.09
69Jordan64.62
70Barbados64.15
71Antigua and Barbuda63.68
71Saint Kitts and Nevis63.68
73Hungary62.74
74Oman62.26
75Bahamas61.79
76Dominica61.32
77Costa Rica60.85
78Albania60.38
79Montenegro59.91
80Micronesia59.43
81Slovakia58.96
82Thailand58.49
83Philippines58.02
84Greece57.55
85Kazakhstan57.08
86Dominican Republic56.60
87Vietnam56.13
88Saint Lucia55.66
88Saint Vincent and the Grenadines55.66
90Marshall Islands54.72
91Senegal54.25
92El Salvador53.77
93Bulgaria53.30
94Namibia52.83
95Cabo Verde52.36
96Serbia51.89
97Kuwait51.42
98Grenada50.94
99Azerbaijan50.47
100Morocco50.00
101Trinidad and Tobago49.53
102North Macedonia49.06
103Nauru48.58
104Colombia48.11
105Kosovo47.64
106Ghana47.17
107Romania46.70
108Kiribati46.23
109Tonga45.75
110Maldives45.28
111Moldova44.34
112Armenia43.87
113Mexico43.40
114Panama42.92
115Benin42.45
116Egypt41.98
117Türkiye41.51
118Sri Lanka41.04
119South Africa40.57
120Uzbekistan40.09
121Guyana39.62
122Tunisia39.15
123Kenya38.68
124Cambodia38.21
125Ukraine37.74
126Côte d'Ivoire37.26
127Belize36.79
128Argentina36.32
129Puerto Rico35.85
130Tuvalu35.38
131Tanzania34.91
132Paraguay34.43
133Mongolia33.96
134Cuba33.49
135Peru33.02
136Ecuador32.55
137Brazil32.08
138Uganda31.60
139Vanuatu31.13
140Pakistan30.66
141Togo30.19
142Gambia29.72
143Bolivia29.25
144Niger28.77
145Laos28.30
146Zambia27.83
147Algeria27.36
148Bangladesh26.89
149Russia26.42
150Mozambique25.94
151Djibouti25.47
152Solomon Islands25.00
153Mauritania24.53
154Ethiopia24.06
155Tajikistan23.58
156Gabon23.11
157Honduras22.64
158Papua New Guinea22.17
159Nepal21.70
160Burkina Faso21.23
161Timor-Leste20.75
162Nigeria20.28
163Malawi19.81
164Eswatini19.34
165Kyrgyzstan18.87
166Guatemala18.40
167Sao Tome and Principe17.92
168Cameroon17.45
169Guinea16.98
170Lesotho16.51
171Suriname16.04
172Bosnia and Herzegovina15.57
173Belarus15.09
174Angola14.62
175Iran14.15
176Madagascar13.68
177Nicaragua13.21
178Mali12.74
179Sierra Leone12.26
180Zimbabwe11.79
181Burundi11.32
182Turkmenistan10.85
183Palestine10.38
184Equatorial Guinea9.91
185Republic of Congo9.43
186Liberia8.96
187Iraq8.49
188Guinea-Bissau8.02
189Chad7.55
190North Korea7.08
191Comoros6.60
192Lebanon6.13
193Venezuela5.66
194Libya5.19
195DR Congo4.72
196Central African Republic4.25
197Myanmar3.77
198Syria3.30
199Eritrea2.83
200Sudan2.36
201Somalia1.89
202Afghanistan1.42
203Haiti0.94
204Yemen0.47
205South Sudan0.00

Analysis

Government Effectiveness measures a country's percentile position among all ranked nations on a composite governance indicator. The unit is a percentile rank expressed as a percentage, where 100% represents the top position and 0% the bottom. According to the source definition, the Worldwide Governance Indicators summarize 'the views on the quality of governance provided by a large number of enterprise, citizen and expert survey respondents in industrial and developing countries,' and 'governance consists of the traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised,' including 'the process by which governments are selected, monitored.' The dataset covers 205 countries, all with data from 2023, representing 100% recency. Data quality is rated 100% official. No extreme outliers were identified using a 3-standard-deviation threshold, and average year-over-year change is 10.6%, well within the 50% volatility threshold.

The top of the ranking is dominated by small, high-income economies and northern European nations. Singapore (Rank 1, 100%), Switzerland (Rank 2, 99.53%), and Denmark (Rank 4, 98.58%) lead the list. Nordic countries occupy multiple top-10 positions: Norway ranks 6th at 97.64% and Finland 7th at 97.17%. Japan (Rank 8, 96.70%) is the highest-ranked East Asian country. The United Arab Emirates (Rank 11, 95.28%) is the highest-ranked Middle Eastern country, outperforming larger economies such as Germany (Rank 29, 85.38%) and the United Kingdom (Rank 30, 84.43%). The United States ranks 25th at 87.74%.

The middle of the ranking contains notable placements. China ranks 52nd at 73.58%, while India ranks 62nd at 67.92%. Brazil sits at Rank 137 with 32.08%, well below regional peers such as Uruguay (Rank 40, 79.25%) and Chile (Rank 47, 75.94%). Russia ranks 149th at 26.42%. At the lower end, Haiti ranks 203rd at 0.94% and Yemen 204th at 0.47%, just above South Sudan at 0%. A notable anomaly: Monaco ranks 3rd at 99.06%, ahead of Denmark (Rank 4, 98.58%), placing a microstate above large, institutionally prominent democracies. Similarly, Brunei Darussalam ranks 21st at 90.09%, ahead of Austria (Rank 22, 89.62%) and Estonia (Rank 23, 88.68%).

This metric has several limitations specific to its construction. Because scores are percentile ranks rather than absolute measures, a country's rank can shift even if its underlying governance does not change, simply due to changes in other countries' scores. The composite is based on surveys of enterprises, citizens, and experts, introducing potential for perception bias and inconsistent coverage across countries. Smaller territories such as Cayman Islands (Rank 24, 88.21%), Bermuda (Rank 26, 87.26%), and American Samoa (Rank 53, 73.11%) are included alongside sovereign states, which may affect comparability. The indicator does not measure specific policies or outcomes directly, and the source note definition is not fully reproduced in publicly available summaries, meaning the full scope of what is and is not included in the composite may not be transparent to all users.

Methodology

The metric is the Government Effectiveness Percentile Rank (indicator code: GE.PER.RNK) from the World Bank World Development Indicators, using 2023 data. Scores represent each country's percentile position among all ranked countries, expressed as a percentage from 0 to 100, where higher values indicate better performance. Per the source definition, 'the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) are a research dataset summarizing the views on the quality of governance provided by a large number of enterprise, citizen and expert survey respondents in industrial and developing countries. Governance consists of the traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised. This includes the process by which governments are selected, mo[nitored].' The dataset covers 205 countries, all with 2023 data (100% recency). Data quality is 100% official. The value range spans 0.00 to 100.00 (a 999% spread). No extreme outliers were found at the 3-sigma threshold. Average year-over-year change is 10.6%, below the 50% volatility threshold. Because scores are percentile ranks, they reflect relative rather than absolute governance quality and can shift due to changes in peer countries rather than changes in the country itself.

Sources