Countries by Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)

Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Russia, and Turkiye each score a perfect 100 out of 100 on the World Bank's SPI Pillar 5 data infrastructure index for 2024, placing them at rank 1 among 191 countries. At the other end, Eritrea scores just 10, the lowest of any country measured. The 90-point gap between the top and bottom reflects the wide variation in countries' legislative frameworks, institutional governance, and statistical standards.

Ranking 2024

Countries by Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)
Rank Country Value
1Australia100
1New Zealand100
1Norway100
1Russia100
1Türkiye100
6Albania95
6Chile95
6Costa Rica95
6Israel95
6Japan95
6South Korea95
6North Macedonia95
13Azerbaijan90
13Belarus90
13Canada90
13Guatemala90
13Iceland90
13Kyrgyzstan90
13Romania90
13Saudi Arabia90
13South Africa90
13Sweden90
13Uzbekistan90
24Austria85
24Burkina Faso85
24Cyprus85
24Czechia85
24Denmark85
24Dominican Republic85
24Finland85
24France85
24Germany85
24Greece85
24Ireland85
24Italy85
24Latvia85
24Lithuania85
24Luxembourg85
24Malaysia85
24Moldova85
24Netherlands85
24Slovenia85
24Spain85
24Switzerland85
24Thailand85
24Uganda85
24Ukraine85
24United Arab Emirates85
24United Kingdom85
50Armenia80
50Belgium80
50Bosnia and Herzegovina80
50Brazil80
50Colombia80
50Croatia80
50Estonia80
50Georgia80
50Hungary80
50Kenya80
50Kosovo80
50Mauritius80
50Mexico80
50Paraguay80
50Poland80
50Portugal80
50Senegal80
50Singapore80
50United States80
69Bahamas75
69Egypt75
69Indonesia75
69Kazakhstan75
69Malta75
69Peru75
69Serbia75
69Uruguay75
77Argentina70
77Benin70
77Cameroon70
77Côte d'Ivoire70
77Ecuador70
77Jordan70
77Mongolia70
77Montenegro70
77Morocco70
77Niger70
77Philippines70
77Rwanda70
77Seychelles70
77Slovakia70
77Somalia70
92Bangladesh65
92Bolivia65
92Bulgaria65
92Cambodia65
92Fiji65
92Namibia65
92Qatar65
92Togo65
92Palestine65
101Barbados60
101Botswana60
101El Salvador60
101Honduras60
101Kuwait60
101Liberia60
101Maldives60
101Mauritania60
101Myanmar60
101Nigeria60
101Pakistan60
101Panama60
101Sri Lanka60
101Tunisia60
101Zimbabwe60
116Afghanistan55
116Antigua and Barbuda55
116Belize55
116Cabo Verde55
116China55
116Eswatini55
116Ghana55
116Guinea55
116Haiti55
116Jamaica55
116Lesotho55
116Malawi55
116Mozambique55
116Nicaragua55
116Oman55
116Palau55
116Sierra Leone55
116Saint Lucia55
116Suriname55
116Tanzania55
116Timor-Leste55
137Angola50
137Chad50
137Republic of Congo50
137Djibouti50
137Gambia50
137Guinea-Bissau50
137India50
137Iran50
137Mali50
137Nepal50
137Samoa50
137San Marino50
137Trinidad and Tobago50
137Zambia50
151Algeria45
151Burundi45
151Ethiopia45
151Gabon45
151Guyana45
151Kiribati45
151Madagascar45
151Solomon Islands45
151Tajikistan45
151Tonga45
161Bahrain40
161Bhutan40
161Brunei40
161Central African Republic40
161Comoros40
161DR Congo40
161Grenada40
161Iraq40
161South Sudan40
161Saint Vincent and the Grenadines40
161Syria40
161Vietnam40
173Equatorial Guinea35
173Laos35
173Lebanon35
173Sao Tome and Principe35
173Saint Kitts and Nevis35
173Vanuatu35
179Dominica30
179Libya30
179Marshall Islands30
179Micronesia30
179Sudan30
184Andorra25
184Papua New Guinea25
184Venezuela25
184Yemen25
188Nauru15
188Turkmenistan15
188Tuvalu15
191Eritrea10

Analysis

The SPI Pillar 5 data infrastructure score measures the hard and soft infrastructure underpinning a country's statistical system on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate stronger capacity. According to the World Bank source note, the data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks. The indicator code is IQ.SPI.PIL5, drawn from the World Bank World Development Indicators for the data year 2024. Coverage is comprehensive: all 191 countries in this ranking have data from the last 7 years, and 100% of data points are classified as official, exceeding the 70% quality threshold. No extreme outliers were identified using a 3-standard-deviation test.

The top of the ranking is dominated by a geographically diverse set of countries. Five nations share rank 1 with a score of 100: Australia, New Zealand, Norway, the Russian Federation, and Turkiye. Seven countries follow at rank 6 with a score of 95, including Chile, Israel, Japan, South Korea, and North Macedonia alongside Albania and Costa Rica. A further eleven countries hold rank 13 with scores of 90, including Canada, Sweden, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and Uzbekistan. The top tier spans every major world region, indicating that high scores at this level are not confined to high-income or Western countries.

The middle of the ranking, covering scores between 55 and 75, contains a wide range of countries across income levels. The United States sits at rank 50 with a score of 80, alongside Brazil, Singapore, and Kenya. China scores only 55, placing it at rank 116 alongside nations such as Haiti, Ghana, and Nicaragua. India scores 50 at rank 137, grouped with countries including Mali, Chad, and Guinea-Bissau. At the bottom, Eritrea scores 10 at rank 191, the only country below 15. Nauru, Turkmenistan, and Tuvalu each score 15 at rank 188. Venezuela scores 25 at rank 184. The presence of large economies such as China and India in the lower-middle range of the ranking is a notable feature of this dataset.

This metric has several important limitations. Scores are recorded in discrete increments of 5 points, which means many countries share the same rank and fine distinctions between countries at the same score level cannot be drawn from this data alone. The composite nature of the pillar score, combining legislation, governance, and standards compliance, means a high overall score does not identify which specific sub-components are strong or weak. Countries in conflict or with severely limited administrative capacity may have scores that reflect reporting constraints rather than actual infrastructure conditions. The average year-over-year change of 12.1% suggests scores can shift meaningfully between assessment periods, so rankings should be interpreted in the context of the 2024 data year specifically.

Methodology

The metric is the Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI) Pillar 5 data infrastructure score, indicator code IQ.SPI.PIL5, sourced from the World Bank World Development Indicators for the data year 2024. Scores are expressed as absolute values on a scale of 0 to 100. Per the source definition, the data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks. The ranking covers 191 countries, all of which have data from within the last 7 years, meeting the recency threshold. All 191 countries report data for the latest year (2024), giving 100% consistency. Data quality is 100% official, well above the 70% threshold. No extreme outliers were detected at the 3-standard-deviation level. Scores range from 10 to 100, a spread of 900%, and are recorded in 5-point increments, which limits within-tier differentiation. Average year-over-year change is 12.1%, below the 50% volatility threshold, indicating reasonable stability across assessment periods.

Sources