Countries by Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100)

Malaysia leads 190 countries in the World Bank's Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI) Pillar 2 data services score with a value of 99.67, while Turkmenistan ranks last at 5.30. The gap of more than 94 points between first and last reflects profound differences in the quality, accessibility, and richness of national statistical data services worldwide.

Ranking 2024

Countries by Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100)
Rank Country Value
1Malaysia99.67
2Poland99
3Norway98.57
4Slovenia98.53
5Singapore98.4
6Finland98.2
7Denmark97.83
8Portugal97.63
9Netherlands97.23
10Ireland97.13
11Latvia96.8
12Mongolia96.33
13Estonia96.3
14South Korea96.1
15Senegal96.03
16Moldova96
17Morocco95.8
18Hungary95.53
19Sweden95.4
20Germany95.33
21Australia95.17
22Slovakia95.1
23United States95
24New Zealand94.9
25Romania94.7
26Israel94.2
27Georgia93.77
28Jordan93.57
29Canada93.3
30Mexico93.23
31Saudi Arabia93.2
32Philippines92.97
33Italy92.7
34United Kingdom92.6
35Bulgaria92.53
36Austria92.43
37Spain92.33
37Palestine92.33
39Lithuania92
40Indonesia91.87
41Japan91.83
42Luxembourg91.53
43France90.17
44Kazakhstan90.13
45Tunisia89.97
46Malta89.3
47Czechia89
47Ecuador89
49Brazil88.97
49Costa Rica88.97
51Colombia88.37
52Chile88.23
52North Macedonia88.23
54Russia87.97
55Thailand87.93
56Switzerland87.9
57Croatia87.53
58Mauritius87.3
59Peru87.17
60Cyprus86.57
61Türkiye86.4
62Armenia86.2
63Argentina85.67
64Uruguay85.3
65India85.13
66Greece85.03
67Belgium85
68South Africa84.63
69United Arab Emirates81.6
70Sri Lanka81.53
71Egypt80.8
72Uzbekistan79.13
73Burkina Faso78.4
74El Salvador77.23
75Serbia76.57
76Niger76.37
77Côte d'Ivoire76.3
78Central African Republic75.73
79Cameroon75
80Paraguay74.03
81Jamaica73.6
82Suriname72.63
83Brunei72.23
84Rwanda72.13
85Panama71.67
86Benin71.37
87Montenegro71.33
88Tanzania71.23
88Uganda71.23
90Nigeria70.97
91Mali70.67
92Kenya70.6
93Myanmar70.47
94Kosovo70.2
95Dominican Republic69.67
96Albania69
97Tajikistan68.97
98Kuwait68.87
99Botswana68.67
100Saint Lucia68.13
101Guatemala68.1
101Trinidad and Tobago68.1
103Togo68.03
104Bolivia67.9
105Belize67.73
106Vietnam67.67
107Laos67.4
108Guyana66.83
109Qatar66.8
110Chad66.73
110Ghana66.73
112Mozambique66.67
112Zimbabwe66.67
114Namibia66.63
115Gambia66.57
115Maldives66.57
117Bhutan66.33
118Saint Vincent and the Grenadines66.3
119Iraq66.27
120Nepal66.23
121Honduras66
122Sao Tome and Principe65.67
123Bosnia and Herzegovina65.6
124Afghanistan65.1
125Ethiopia64.43
126Sierra Leone64.37
127Cambodia64.27
128Mauritania63.9
129Samoa63.7
130Bangladesh63.47
131Malawi63.27
132Nicaragua63.2
133Fiji63.13
134Angola63.07
134Kiribati63.07
136Antigua and Barbuda62.9
137Iceland62.83
138DR Congo62.8
138Iran62.8
138Lebanon62.8
141Solomon Islands62.77
142Barbados62.57
143Eswatini62.53
143Zambia62.53
145Marshall Islands62.33
146Papua New Guinea62.23
147Tonga62.17
148Pakistan61.97
149Madagascar61.77
149Timor-Leste61.77
151Vanuatu61.67
152Palau61.57
153Tuvalu61.07
154San Marino60.73
155Liberia59.93
156Libya59.33
157Algeria58.9
158Micronesia58.57
159Sudan57.93
160Ukraine55.13
161Andorra55.03
162Belarus53.8
163Kyrgyzstan50.87
164Oman48.83
165Somalia48.73
166Seychelles48
167China43.93
168Burundi42.47
169Nauru40.7
170Bahrain39.53
171Azerbaijan36.9
172Comoros33.6
173Cabo Verde31.8
174Lesotho31.47
175Guinea30.6
176Saint Kitts and Nevis30.5
177Gabon30.23
178Dominica29.93
179Equatorial Guinea29.63
180Guinea-Bissau29.5
181Republic of Congo29.17
182Grenada28.83
183Yemen28.3
184Djibouti28.27
185Bahamas27.3
186Syria26.43
187Haiti24.97
188Venezuela24.4
189South Sudan8.33
190Turkmenistan5.3

Analysis

This metric measures how well countries deliver statistical data services to users. According to the source definition, the data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Scores are expressed on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher values indicate better performance. The dataset covers 190 countries with data from 2024, with 100% of datapoints classified as official and no extreme outliers detected at the 3-standard-deviation threshold. The full range runs from 5.30 to 99.67, a spread of 1,780.5%.

The top of the ranking is dominated by a mix of European nations, high-income Asian economies, and a few notable exceptions. Malaysia (rank 1, 99.67) leads ahead of Poland (rank 2, 99.00) and Norway (rank 3, 98.57). Slovenia (rank 4, 98.53) and Singapore (rank 5, 98.40) round out the top five. The top 20 includes Finland (rank 6, 98.20), Denmark (rank 7, 97.83), Portugal (rank 8, 97.63), Netherlands (rank 9, 97.23), and Ireland (rank 10, 97.13). Mongolia (rank 12, 96.33) and Senegal (rank 15, 96.03) appear in the top 15, placing ahead of several high-income Western nations, which is notable. Morocco (rank 17, 95.80) and Moldova (rank 16, 96.00) also score in the top 20.

In the middle of the ranking, scores range broadly through the 60s and 70s. Serbia sits at rank 75 with a score of 76.57, while Viet Nam ranks 106 at 67.67 and Bangladesh ranks 130 at 63.47. Iceland, a high-income Nordic country, ranks 137 with a score of only 62.83, placing it below countries such as Kiribati (rank 134, 63.07) and Samoa (rank 129, 63.70). At the lower end, China ranks 167 with a score of 43.93, and Bahrain ranks 170 at 39.53. The bottom five include Dominica (rank 178, 29.93), Equatorial Guinea (rank 179, 29.63), Guinea-Bissau (rank 180, 29.50), Congo, Rep. (rank 181, 29.17), and Grenada (rank 182, 28.83), with South Sudan (rank 189, 8.33) and Turkmenistan (rank 190, 5.30) at the very bottom.

Several limitations apply to this metric. The composite structure means that weaknesses in any one of the four sub-dimensions can significantly depress a country's overall score, without indicating which specific area is deficient. The source note itself is truncated, noting that advisory and analytical services may not be fully captured in the definition as published. Countries with limited statistical infrastructure may also underreport the very data used to score them, creating a potential downward bias at the lower end. Scores reflect a single reference year (2024) and annual volatility averaged 24.7% year-over-year, suggesting that rankings can shift materially between periods. Comparisons between countries at similar score levels should be made with caution given the composite nature of the indicator.

Methodology

The metric is drawn from the World Bank World Development Indicators, indicator code IQ.SPI.PIL2, with data for the reference year 2024. As defined in the source note, the data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might not be fully captured in the definition as published. Scores are expressed on a scale of 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better performance. The ranking covers 190 countries, all with data from within the last 7 years (100% recency). All 190 datapoints are classified as official quality. No extreme outliers were identified at the 3-standard-deviation threshold. The data range spans 5.30 to 99.67, a spread of 1,780.5%. Average year-over-year change across the dataset is 24.7%, indicating moderate but meaningful volatility. The composite construction of the indicator means that individual sub-dimension scores are not directly visible in the aggregate ranking.

Sources