Countries by Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)
Cote d'Ivoire ranks first with 100% of its population at risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, meaning the entire population faces potential financial ruin if surgery is needed. At the other end, eleven countries including Germany, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom record 0%, indicating negligible financial risk. The gap between these extremes spans the full range of the metric and reflects stark differences in how surgical costs fall on individuals.
Ranking 2022
Values shown in %.
| Rank | Country | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Côte d'Ivoire | 100.00 |
| 2 | Burundi | 97.80 |
| 3 | Yemen | 93.40 |
| 4 | Latvia | 89.90 |
| 5 | Syria | 87.50 |
| 6 | Guinea-Bissau | 86.50 |
| 7 | Niger | 86.30 |
| 8 | DR Congo | 85.00 |
| 9 | Sierra Leone | 84.30 |
| 10 | Chad | 82.40 |
| 11 | Estonia | 78.30 |
| 12 | Togo | 72.40 |
| 13 | Mauritania | 69.10 |
| 14 | Uganda | 68.40 |
| 15 | Tajikistan | 68.20 |
| 16 | Republic of Congo | 63.70 |
| 17 | Sudan | 63.30 |
| 18 | Madagascar | 59.00 |
| 19 | Nepal | 58.20 |
| 20 | Guinea | 57.50 |
| 21 | Burkina Faso | 56.20 |
| 22 | Cameroon | 54.30 |
| 23 | Angola | 51.70 |
| 24 | Gambia | 51.60 |
| 25 | Bangladesh | 51.00 |
| 26 | Comoros | 47.80 |
| 27 | Benin | 47.40 |
| 28 | Mali | 46.60 |
| 29 | Tanzania | 45.90 |
| 30 | Honduras | 45.80 |
| 31 | Guatemala | 44.10 |
| 32 | Iran | 43.70 |
| 33 | Papua New Guinea | 39.50 |
| 34 | Nicaragua | 38.30 |
| 35 | Pakistan | 33.70 |
| 36 | Lithuania | 32.60 |
| 37 | Lesotho | 30.00 |
| 38 | Belize | 29.50 |
| 39 | Sri Lanka | 29.20 |
| 40 | Senegal | 28.40 |
| 41 | Egypt | 26.60 |
| 42 | Iraq | 26.40 |
| 43 | Paraguay | 25.20 |
| 44 | Brazil | 23.10 |
| 45 | Iceland | 22.60 |
| 46 | Cabo Verde | 21.60 |
| 47 | Botswana | 20.90 |
| 47 | Morocco | 20.90 |
| 49 | Laos | 20.50 |
| 50 | India | 20.40 |
| 51 | Hungary | 20.20 |
| 52 | Haiti | 19.10 |
| 53 | Armenia | 19.00 |
| 54 | Ecuador | 18.20 |
| 55 | Indonesia | 17.30 |
| 55 | Kenya | 17.30 |
| 55 | Rwanda | 17.30 |
| 58 | Philippines | 16.60 |
| 59 | Gabon | 15.80 |
| 60 | Colombia | 15.10 |
| 61 | Bolivia | 14.30 |
| 62 | Chile | 13.80 |
| 63 | Tunisia | 13.60 |
| 64 | El Salvador | 13.30 |
| 65 | Namibia | 11.50 |
| 65 | South Africa | 11.50 |
| 67 | Malaysia | 11.30 |
| 68 | Algeria | 10.80 |
| 68 | Russia | 10.80 |
| 68 | Seychelles | 10.80 |
| 71 | Mongolia | 10.40 |
| 72 | Ghana | 9.10 |
| 73 | Costa Rica | 8.90 |
| 74 | Mauritius | 8.80 |
| 75 | Venezuela | 8.60 |
| 76 | Mexico | 8.20 |
| 77 | Cyprus | 6.10 |
| 78 | Dominican Republic | 5.70 |
| 79 | Ethiopia | 5.60 |
| 79 | Ukraine | 5.60 |
| 81 | Portugal | 5.20 |
| 82 | Bulgaria | 5.00 |
| 82 | Serbia | 5.00 |
| 84 | Montenegro | 4.70 |
| 85 | Argentina | 4.50 |
| 86 | Peru | 4.40 |
| 87 | Lebanon | 4.10 |
| 88 | China | 3.70 |
| 89 | Solomon Islands | 3.30 |
| 90 | Albania | 3.10 |
| 90 | Jamaica | 3.10 |
| 92 | Timor-Leste | 2.90 |
| 93 | Georgia | 2.60 |
| 94 | Greece | 2.30 |
| 95 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2.20 |
| 96 | Samoa | 1.80 |
| 97 | Israel | 1.70 |
| 98 | Bhutan | 1.60 |
| 99 | Belarus | 1.50 |
| 100 | Switzerland | 1.00 |
| 101 | Moldova | 0.90 |
| 102 | Italy | 0.70 |
| 102 | Spain | 0.70 |
| 102 | Vanuatu | 0.70 |
| 105 | Japan | 0.50 |
| 106 | Croatia | 0.40 |
| 106 | Kazakhstan | 0.40 |
| 106 | Luxembourg | 0.40 |
| 106 | United Arab Emirates | 0.40 |
| 110 | Thailand | 0.30 |
| 110 | United States | 0.30 |
| 112 | Austria | 0.20 |
| 113 | Australia | 0.10 |
| 113 | Canada | 0.10 |
| 113 | France | 0.10 |
| 113 | Ireland | 0.10 |
| 113 | South Korea | 0.10 |
| 113 | Poland | 0.10 |
| 113 | Romania | 0.10 |
| 113 | Slovenia | 0.10 |
| 121 | Belgium | 0.00 |
| 121 | Denmark | 0.00 |
| 121 | Finland | 0.00 |
| 121 | Germany | 0.00 |
| 121 | Kiribati | 0.00 |
| 121 | Marshall Islands | 0.00 |
| 121 | Netherlands | 0.00 |
| 121 | Norway | 0.00 |
| 121 | Slovakia | 0.00 |
| 121 | Sweden | 0.00 |
| 121 | United Kingdom | 0.00 |
Analysis
This metric measures the proportion of a population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income. The unit is percentage of people at risk, and a higher value indicates a greater share of the population exposed to financial hardship from surgical costs. The indicator covers only direct out-of-pocket surgical and anaesthesia payments; other healthcare costs are not included. Data are drawn from the World Bank World Development Indicators (indicator code SH.SGR.CRSK.ZS), with 131 countries covered, 94.7% of which have data from the last seven years, and 100% of data points classified as official-quality. The latest reference year is 2022, with 86.3% of countries reporting in that year.
The ten highest-ranked countries, all recording above 80%, are concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa and conflict-affected states. Cote d'Ivoire leads at 100%, followed by Burundi at 97.8%, Yemen at 93.4%, Latvia at 89.9%, and Syria at 87.5%. Guinea-Bissau (86.5%), Niger (86.3%), Democratic Republic of Congo (85%), Sierra Leone (84.3%), and Chad (82.4%) complete the top ten. These countries share limited public funding for healthcare, meaning surgical costs are borne almost entirely by individuals. Estonia (rank 11, 78.3%) and Lithuania (rank 36, 32.6%) are notable as high-income European Union members appearing alongside low-income nations in the upper portion of the ranking.
In the middle of the ranking, values range from roughly 20% to 50%. Countries such as Bangladesh (rank 25, 51%), India (rank 50, 20.4%), and Indonesia (rank 55, 17.3%) represent large populations where a significant minority faces catastrophic surgical costs. Brazil ranks 44th at 23.1%, while Chile sits at rank 62 with 13.8%. At the lower end of risk, countries such as China (rank 88, 3.7%), Georgia (rank 93, 2.6%), and Belarus (rank 99, 1.5%) show substantially reduced exposure. The United States appears at rank 110 with just 0.3%, placing it among countries with the lowest recorded risk despite its well-documented high healthcare costs, which reflects the specific definition used here rather than overall healthcare affordability.
Several limitations apply to this metric. The definition captures only out-of-pocket surgical and anaesthesia payments exceeding 10% of income and does not account for indirect costs such as travel, post-operative care, or lost income during recovery. Countries with very low surgical utilization may show artificially low risk figures if people forgo surgery rather than face the cost. Differences in income measurement and surgical cost data collection across countries can affect comparability. The 2022 reference year applies to 86.3% of countries; the remainder use earlier estimates, which may not reflect current conditions. The full range of 0% to 100% and the average year-over-year change of 36.8% suggest significant variation both across countries and over time, which should be considered when drawing comparisons.
Methodology
Data are sourced from the World Bank World Development Indicators, indicator code SH.SGR.CRSK.ZS, with a primary reference year of 2022. The metric measures the proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income. Coverage includes 131 countries, of which 94.7% have data from the last seven years and 86.3% report specifically for 2022. All 131 data points are classified as official quality. No extreme outliers were identified using a 3-standard-deviation threshold. The average year-over-year change across the dataset is 36.8%, below the 50% volatility threshold. Values range from 0% to 100%, a spread of 999% relative to the minimum. No microstates (population under 1 million) are included in the 131-country sample.