Countries by People using safely managed sanitation services, urban (% of urban population)
Three countries — Andorra, Monaco, and Singapore — achieve 100% coverage of safely managed sanitation services among their urban populations, the highest possible value in this ranking. At the opposite end, Armenia records 0%, placing it last among 124 countries. The 100-percentage-point gap between the top and bottom illustrates the scale of disparity in urban sanitation infrastructure worldwide.
Ranking 2024
Values shown in %.
| Rank | Country | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andorra | 100.00 |
| 1 | Monaco | 100.00 |
| 1 | Singapore | 100.00 |
| 4 | Kuwait | 100.00 |
| 5 | Austria | 99.95 |
| 6 | Switzerland | 99.77 |
| 7 | Chile | 99.19 |
| 8 | United Kingdom | 98.96 |
| 9 | United Arab Emirates | 98.44 |
| 10 | Germany | 98.33 |
| 11 | Lithuania | 97.90 |
| 12 | Estonia | 97.84 |
| 13 | Greece | 97.73 |
| 14 | Netherlands | 97.50 |
| 15 | Israel | 97.36 |
| 16 | United States | 97.19 |
| 17 | Luxembourg | 96.94 |
| 18 | Portugal | 96.52 |
| 19 | Sweden | 95.82 |
| 20 | Hong Kong | 94.83 |
| 21 | Czechia | 94.51 |
| 22 | Hungary | 93.23 |
| 23 | Ukraine | 92.37 |
| 24 | Kyrgyzstan | 89.65 |
| 25 | Slovakia | 89.50 |
| 26 | Tunisia | 89.17 |
| 27 | Ireland | 86.85 |
| 28 | Cyprus | 86.22 |
| 29 | Saudi Arabia | 86.22 |
| 30 | Palestine | 85.14 |
| 31 | Croatia | 85.14 |
| 32 | China | 85.06 |
| 33 | Jordan | 82.54 |
| 34 | Canada | 81.23 |
| 35 | Belarus | 81.11 |
| 36 | Macao | 79.96 |
| 37 | Bulgaria | 79.55 |
| 38 | Italy | 78.57 |
| 39 | Türkiye | 78.13 |
| 40 | Mongolia | 77.78 |
| 41 | Moldova | 77.22 |
| 42 | Kazakhstan | 75.94 |
| 43 | Iran | 75.33 |
| 44 | South Africa | 74.81 |
| 45 | Mauritius | 72.23 |
| 46 | Georgia | 71.08 |
| 47 | Laos | 69.27 |
| 48 | Egypt | 68.97 |
| 49 | Azerbaijan | 67.63 |
| 50 | Yemen | 65.55 |
| 51 | Mexico | 65.35 |
| 52 | Russia | 64.94 |
| 53 | Algeria | 64.57 |
| 54 | Albania | 63.33 |
| 55 | Jamaica | 63.23 |
| 56 | Uzbekistan | 63.14 |
| 57 | Peru | 60.06 |
| 58 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 58.10 |
| 59 | Brazil | 56.61 |
| 60 | India | 55.79 |
| 61 | Montenegro | 55.45 |
| 62 | Philippines | 54.05 |
| 63 | Mozambique | 53.33 |
| 64 | Cambodia | 52.83 |
| 65 | Myanmar | 52.69 |
| 66 | Iraq | 52.23 |
| 67 | Paraguay | 51.28 |
| 68 | Panama | 50.29 |
| 69 | Trinidad and Tobago | 46.41 |
| 70 | Comoros | 46.09 |
| 71 | Nepal | 45.96 |
| 72 | Argentina | 45.57 |
| 73 | Djibouti | 44.76 |
| 74 | Bhutan | 44.41 |
| 75 | Ecuador | 43.97 |
| 76 | Samoa | 43.48 |
| 77 | Fiji | 42.53 |
| 78 | Dominican Republic | 42.25 |
| 79 | Cuba | 41.88 |
| 80 | Malawi | 41.16 |
| 81 | Vietnam | 41.02 |
| 82 | Eswatini | 40.86 |
| 83 | Morocco | 40.77 |
| 84 | Tanzania | 39.48 |
| 85 | Tuvalu | 37.36 |
| 86 | Nigeria | 36.83 |
| 87 | Sao Tome and Principe | 35.48 |
| 88 | Lesotho | 34.65 |
| 89 | Guyana | 34.14 |
| 90 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 33.32 |
| 91 | Nauru | 33.16 |
| 92 | Côte d'Ivoire | 32.20 |
| 93 | Chad | 32.02 |
| 94 | Burkina Faso | 31.38 |
| 95 | Gambia | 31.03 |
| 96 | Papua New Guinea | 31.00 |
| 97 | Bangladesh | 30.74 |
| 98 | Thailand | 30.73 |
| 99 | Guinea-Bissau | 30.40 |
| 100 | El Salvador | 28.91 |
| 101 | Kenya | 27.86 |
| 102 | Senegal | 27.54 |
| 103 | Kiribati | 25.32 |
| 104 | Afghanistan | 24.94 |
| 105 | Uganda | 24.62 |
| 106 | Niger | 24.42 |
| 107 | Costa Rica | 24.33 |
| 108 | Sierra Leone | 24.32 |
| 109 | Central African Republic | 23.43 |
| 110 | Tonga | 22.21 |
| 111 | Benin | 21.82 |
| 112 | Suriname | 20.69 |
| 113 | Serbia | 19.95 |
| 114 | Ethiopia | 18.94 |
| 115 | Ghana | 17.64 |
| 116 | Somalia | 17.35 |
| 117 | Madagascar | 16.75 |
| 118 | DR Congo | 15.15 |
| 119 | Togo | 14.97 |
| 120 | Zimbabwe | 10.34 |
| 121 | Mali | 9.75 |
| 122 | North Macedonia | 8.19 |
| 123 | Colombia | 7.19 |
| 124 | Armenia | 0.00 |
Analysis
This metric measures the percentage of urban residents using safely managed sanitation services. According to the source definition, this covers people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour flush to piped sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines: ventilated improved pit latrines, compositing toilets or pit latrines with slabs. The unit is the percentage of the urban population. The dataset covers 124 countries using data from the World Bank World Development Indicators (indicator code SH.STA.SMSS.UR.ZS), with a reference year of 2024. All 124 countries have data from the last seven years, and 100% of datapoints are classified as official-quality. No extreme outliers were identified using a three-standard-deviation threshold.
The top of the ranking is dominated by high-income countries and city-states. Andorra, Monaco, and Singapore all score 100% (ranks 1 to 3). Kuwait follows closely at rank 4 with 99.999%, and Austria ranks 5th at 99.953%. Switzerland (rank 6, 99.770%), Chile (rank 7, 99.191%), the United Kingdom (rank 8, 98.956%), and Germany (rank 10, 98.327%) also place in the top tier. Several European countries cluster between 95% and 98%, including the Netherlands (rank 14, 97.5%), the United States (rank 16, 97.190%), and Sweden (rank 19, 95.818%). These rankings reflect consistently high values across the upper quarter of the distribution.
The middle of the ranking shows considerable variation. China ranks 32nd at 85.056%, while Canada sits lower at rank 34 with 81.230%. Italy ranks 38th at 78.570%, noticeably below most of its Western European peers. Brazil ranks 59th at 56.608%, and India ranks 60th at 55.792%. The lower portion of the ranking includes countries such as Nigeria (rank 86, 36.832%), Bangladesh (rank 97, 30.743%), and Thailand (rank 98, 30.728%). Costa Rica ranks 107th at 24.326%, placing it below several countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Serbia ranks 113th at 19.946%, and Colombia ranks 123rd at just 7.188%, second to last. Armenia ranks last at 0%.
Several data limitations apply to this metric. The indicator captures only the urban population and does not reflect rural sanitation conditions, which can differ substantially. The measure depends on household-level data collection and national reporting, which varies in methodology and frequency across countries. The definition requires that facilities be unshared and that excreta be safely managed, meaning some households with physically improved facilities may not be counted if those conditions are not met. The wide range of values — from 0% to 100% — and the uneven distribution across the 124 countries means that regional comparisons should be made with attention to differing data collection timelines and estimation methods.
Methodology
Data are drawn from the World Bank World Development Indicators, indicator code SH.STA.SMSS.UR.ZS, with a reference year of 2024. The metric is defined as the percentage of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour flush to piped sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines: ventilated improved pit latrines, compositing toilets or pit latrines with slabs. The ranking covers 124 countries, all of which have data from within the last seven years, meeting the recency threshold. All datapoints are classified as official quality, exceeding the 70% quality threshold. The data range spans 0% to 100%, a spread of 100 percentage points. No extreme outliers were identified under a three-standard-deviation test. Average year-over-year change is 2.3%, well within the 50% volatility threshold. Values are expressed as a percentage of the urban population only; rural populations are excluded from this indicator.